What does your website hand your employees to share?

Straight talk, before you type anything

I built this tool in a few days, on a stack of assumptions — without the inside knowledge to be sure these are the exact metrics that matter for employee advocacy. The four categories and their weights are editorial judgment; nobody has proven they cause employees to post.

This tool scrapes nothing from LinkedIn and never will. It does use one thing it did not observe itself: for half of the Employee & Culture score, it reads aggregate employee-posting counts from a licensed third-party index of public professional-network activity. I can't audit how that index is compiled and neither can you, so every line that rests on it says so, a zero is reported as "none in the index" rather than "nobody posts," and it is capped at 12.5% of the grade.

To prioritize report generation speed, reports are cached for 30 days. There are currently 350 pre-generated reports cached — you can view those reports here.

What you can hold me to: every claim cites its evidence and says where it came from, robots.txt is honored on every request, and when this tool can't read a site — or can't match it to a company in that index — it says so instead of inventing a grade.